New Paradigm time – Moving On
Working online in the marketing arena in NZ I’d say that I got got hit by the US global financial crisis up to one year before many other local businesses.
The only good thing about that; was experiencing an upturn a bit sooner than other local businesses. But it has been a fragile recovery in many respects.
The reasons for the great depression are still being debated as are theories on the global financial crisis that we are still working through.
Despite local (NZ) surveys of business confidence picking 2011 as a much better year ( and I think they are right) there is still an underlying unease that our business foundations have been very much shaken to the core and found wanting.
I’ve written before about the need for new business models and more sustainability thinking.
This time, however it is our entire cultural ecosystem that is at fault and we are in uncharted waters to the extent that a whole new paradigm is needed.
Raf Manji over on his excellent Sustento site makes similar points every month. Even when he is commenting on entertainment ..Gekko movie
The disconnect between the financial markets and the real world has grown so wide that a chasm has been created, a big black monetary hole which is dragging us all in. This film has much more impact than Mike Moore’s recent treatise on capitalism because it paints a truer picture: the excess, the egos, the glamour….and the frailties of us all.
There has been a film about some of the wider issues quietily clocking up internet views for the past 3 years – it is called Zeitgeist: Moving Forward and is about “system disorder”.
We are suffering from major structural system problems in our society. The values that we claim and like to support have been supplanted by more mercenary and life threatening behaviour.
“the main threat to human survival was nature – today it is culture”
SYNOPSIS: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward, by director Peter Joseph, is a feature length documentary work which will present a case for a needed transition out of the current socioeconomic monetary paradigm which governs the entire world society.
This subject matter will transcend the issues of cultural relativism and traditional ideology and move to relate the core, empirical “life ground” attributes of human and social survival, extrapolating those immutable natural laws into a new sustainable social paradigm called a “Resource-Based Economy”.
Having seen this movie I do like that it underlines the finite resources and systemic failure of our current economic systems. These are important questions – often obscured by too much theory.
The answers; as it turns out are not so easy to arrive at.
In that sense it is not much different than say Triple Crunch – Economics as if People & the planet Mattered, Transition Towns, The Oil Drum and others seeking to address our rampart out-of-control consumerism and headlong rush to the next economic crash. In NZ the good people at Grey Lynn 2030 as part of transition towns should show an interest in this movie.
I also liked the reference to the Equality Trust and their work on the “social determinants of health and on the societal effects of income inequality”.
Some of the talking heads would have been better introduced if we knew a bit more about them and current roles. Those talking head academic experts should be listed over here on the IMDB entry but as at post time they are not although Richard Wilkinson of Equality Trust looks to be one of them.
Dr James Gilligan is one of the experts (strangely Gilligan is not even listed in the credits) – he mis-pronounces Dunedin and refers to a longitudinal health study there but without giving credit to the Otago Med School. I mention this because it is useful to check sources and that is much harder to do if they are glossed over or not listed.
I would have thought Theodore Dalrymple (Dr Anthony Daniels might have been better in this part but I suspect that Dr Daniels views on causes and solutions would have been in conflict with the overall thesis.
I also found the soundtrack a little obtrusive at times especially in the first 40 mins – but a bit of a remix there would solve that. At one point I thought there may have been a party next door but that was an attemt at ambient drumming.
What makes it film a bit different is its blind faith in rational pure science and over reliance on altruistic technology as the answer to a broken system. There is a fair amount of coverage of the Venus Project and ideas of engineer Jacque Fresco in the last part of the film.
That thinking owes a great deal to the Technocracy movement of the 1920-1930’s and is perhaps the weakest point of the film.
There have been 2 earlier films in the series and robust set of discussions called an earlier version of the Venus Project a hoax. (I note that the arcosanti project in progress for 40 years had similar ideas but seems to be a bit stuck.) It also appears that the 2 earlier films may have been a bit out there with conspiracy theories so that is thankfully gone in this – the 3rd film of the series.
The interesting point about all of these different groups (transition towns etc.) is that many of them are beginning to understand that our current monetary systems are just not working out and something must be done – urgently.
The frustrating part is that, yet again we have another bunch of people looking to be a movement who don’t appear to be talking to others already active in a similar space.
If the zeitgeist people want to build a movement they need to lose the wacky science and concentrate on clearly defined themes and messages that are supported by environmental activists, monetary reformers and concerned citizens.
I’m hopeful that the Zeitgeist movement as they like to be called actually has some economists on the payroll somewhere and can make better sense of this because we do need better outcomes for all.
I had higher hopes for this film, but for now Triple Crunch and Transistion towns make way more sense to me.